
Those who follow the Twitter feed know that I do post a lot of links from The Globe and Mail. Besides being Canada's national newspaper, The Globe and Mail has an approach to stories that are better suited for an audience that is trying to learn more about Canada.
Well, that landscape has changed starting today as The Globe and Mail is going to a paywall starting today.
The terms are pretty harsh: you get 10 articles a month. If you choose to subscribe, you have to pay $19.99/month after getting a 1-month trial for 99¢. If you can subscribe to the weekend edition, you still have to pay $4.99/month. Only those with a 5- or 6-day subscription will get free, unlimited access.
$4.99/month would have spoken to a more viable option, especially for those who don't live in Canada.
If I lived in Toronto or elsewhere in Canada, I would be a subscriber to The Globe and Mail. But I don't and so I can't. I can understand the desire for getting more money from Canadians for its content, since Canadians could choose to subscribe. But if you live in Paris or London or New York or Stockholm, you want to read the news of Canada even if you can't subscribe.
Since the Internet responds to ISP addresses, The Globe and Mail could interact a paywall that only responds to Canadian ISPs. After all, the ads on the Web site don't realistically apply to those outside Canada.
The difficulty with other news sources is that the newspaper landscape in Canada is rather sad. The majority of newspapers in major Canadian cities are owned by Postmedia Network, an organization spun off from Canwest. The network is as weak as it is extensive, with few decisions, especially on national news, being made in those local cities.
Besides the right-wing dominant National Post, these major papers are part of the Postmedia Network: Calgary Herald, Edmonton Journal, The (Montréal) Gazette, Regina Leader-Post, Ottawa Citizen, The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon, SK), Windsor Star, and both daily Vancouver newspapers, the Vancouver Sun and The Province.
And Postmedia has launched paywalls at some of its newspapers. At least with The Globe and Mail, you get more articles you might want to pay for having.
They bring a point of view that is more about cost savings than strong journalism. If you think this is about political philosophy, The Globe and Mail is pretty conservative. For those who think The New York Times or to a lesser extent, The Washington Post, are liberal, Canada doesn't have that philosophical equivalent.
The U.S. has USA Today, plus NYT and WP, as papers that serve a broad national interest. When The New York Times put up its paywall, you could turn to The Washington Post. There is no such alternative on the Canadian newspaper landscape. The National Post is national, but certainly not straight ahead in its coverage.
As a reader, I turn to The New York Times less often as a new source as a result of the paywall, even if you can find ways to get around paywalls. This is my greatest fear for The Globe and Mail.
The newspaper does point out that "readers who find stories through social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook as well as search engines and blogs won't have those stories count against their monthly cap." For those that are savvy enough to do so, they can still tune in. For others, they may drop out.
In a follow-up article, The Globe and Mail spelled it out in a way that leads us to wonder what is covered.
"The Globe and Mail homepage and all section pages — such as Business, Life, Sports and Commentary — will not count against the meter. You can visit and view those pages as many times as you like."
Since the count is reset at the end of the month, you will get 10 days to experiment at the end of October. Hopefully, the newspaper will give you a heads-up. Still the idea of counting to 10 articles in 30 days with $20 at stake is the opposite tone you want when people are looking for news and information. We'll follow up to see how the new system will work.
The good news is that those who pick up the Twitter feed (@canadian_xing) can read those links without worry about the cap. The bad news for me is getting that info to my readers.
In the Twitter feed, we'll be adding more content from CBC News, the Toronto Star, Huffington Post Canada and other sources where we can find similar stories. In other instances, we will just draw attention to the story. Sometimes, The Globe and Mail will be the only source and we will have to proceed accordingly.
Reading about Canada from strong journalism sources is the best way to keep abreast of what is going on up north. The Globe and Mail paywall makes that a lot more difficult to do. Stick with CanadianCrossing.com and we'll make it work somehow. Our curiosity will still be vibrant, even if our choices are now more limited.
photo credit