Every U.S. president, Republican or Democratic, always says that the State of the Union is strong, even when it's not. No president can't say it's weak; just can't happen. When it comes to the State of Canadian teams in the NHL, we will say what needs to be said.
Canada may have 8 teams in the 30-team NHL by the time the puck drops, though this year that might not be in early October.
Television
If the Canadian teams were better on the ice, and still getting ignored by U.S. television, we would have a much stronger case of bias. We saw the way the Florida Panthers were treated by U.S. TV in this year's playoffs, treatment usually reserved for Canadian teams.
Ottawa proved on the ice that the team deserves more U.S. exposure. But Ottawa is seen as a lesser market, meaning not as well known as Toronto, Montréal, and Vancouver. When NBC's #1 crew called Game 7 Ottawa Senators, that would have been their first Senators game since Game 5 of the 2007 Stanley Cup finals.
The Senators get lost in the shuffle since they don't get much national exposure on Hockey Night in Canada, a major gateway for U.S. TV.
Speaking of Hockey Night in Canada, the NHL Network never explained its decision to stop running the second half of Hockey Night in Canada. Even if it was tape-delayed and occasionally censored, the programming brought teams to U.S. eyeballs that weren't otherwise seen. And the "After Hours" feature was a nice insight into CBC's coverage of hockey and a more human side to players, coaches, and yes broadcasters that seemed perfect for the NHL Network. So the move is still puzzling.
The loss of "After Hours" to Americans who couldn't even access the feature online was even more of a headshaker. We see the U.S. outlets add more hockey than ever before, somewhat at the expense of Canadian teams and Canadian features.
The NHL Network also proved to be inconsistent on which early HNIC games to carry, going out of its way to not show Winnipeg or Ottawa in a prime-time setting. Even the Maple Leafs suffered as the channel focused more on Montréal telecasts. This was made easier now that CBC shows Habs games in HD, but harder in that the Canadiens had a worse season than Toronto.
While more Canadian coverage may return when the teams get better, next year might be the time to break out NHL Center Ice. Though I feel like my cable company owes me a partial refund for the NHL Network not doing what it was intended to do: Show the teams not cool enough for NBCSN.
The news wasn't all bad. Vancouver Canucks fans got a few TSN simulcasts toward the end of the season on NBCSN. While this didn't make up for the loss of Canucks games on CBC (on the NHL Network), the trend of late-night sim subs on NBCSN would be welcome. The channel even carried live late-night games on Saturday night, something the NHL Network has refused to do since it carried live HNIC late games in the U.S. cable channel's first season.
The worst casualties of the loss of late HNIC to U.S. viewers were the Alberta twins, Calgary and Edmonton. The St. Louis Blues had more NBCSN telecasts in the final week of the regular season (2) than those Western Canada teams were shown live (1) on any U.S. national TV outlet.
Even though Vancouver won back-to-back Presidents Trophies, we don't expect their visibility to increase, unless the NHL Network brings back late HNIC games. After coming one game short of winning the Cup, Vancouver had two-NBCSN produced telecasts the whole season, and one of those were Opening Night. Being eliminated in the first round won't make that number jump.
6 of the 12 postseason games were played on Canadian soil. NBC sent a crew to 5 of the 6 games in Canada, which has to be a record. Given who they sent, American viewers would have been better off to have CBC simulcasts, but the fact that they weren't afraid to go to Canada is a good sign, sort of.
On the Ice
Montréal, Calgary, and Edmonton (likely) will have new coaches next year. Toronto is still trying out its new head coach. The coaching situation in Ottawa, Vancouver, and Winnipeg isn't the problem.
Tom Renney might get replaced by Brent Sutter, who left the Flames in a meh scenario. Sutter wasn't fired nor did he quit. Meh!
Ironically, the other Sutter these days ended up kicking the Los Angeles Kings in the butt. Without Darryl Sutter, Vancouver advances to the second round.
As good as Ottawa was this year compared to expectations, being 8th gets you an invitation but not much else. Toronto, Calgary, and Winnipeg/Atlanta are very good 10th place teams. As the NHL is teaching us, your team should really be good enough to be a 6th place team, and the Maple Leafs, Flames, and Jets are there.
This was Montréal's worst showing since B&W television or maybe even radio. Anyway, the Canadiens can bounce back IF a new coach and GM shakes things up. But they may not have the talent to be up to 6th place. The Habs showed us what they can do by overachieving in 2010, but to Montréal fans, 2010 seems so far away.
Vancouver may/may not trade a goalie, but this team needs to fill a few minor holes, like a 2nd line scoring center. You have to score a lot of goals to win a Presidents Trophy, but this team has struggled to score in the postseason. A healthy Ryan Kesler next year will help; if Kesler had the shoulder surgery he apparently needs, then the Canucks might not have traded Cody Hodgson and Vancouver would still be playing.
Ottawa proved that you can do well with youth, something Edmonton had to notice. No team has more exciting talent than the Oilers, but the team is "tired" of getting top picks.
Gary Bettman tried to fix the Winnipeg situation, and Donald Fehr, looking to show his (fading) masculinity, said no. So short of a last-second miracle (Phoenix Coyotes to Quebec City), the Jets will have to contend with playing divisional games in Miami, Tampa Bay, Washington, and Raleigh. Winnipeg will benefit more from playing in the same division as Minnesota, Chicago, and St. Louis.
Will Calgary shake things up by trading Jarome Iginla and Miikka Kiprusoff? Haven't we asked that question for several years?
The Flames don't want to trade those players, and they can't get enough firepower to jump into the bottom tier of the Western Conference playoffs pile. You can't find finer athletes and human beings than Iginla and Kiprusoff. Trading them in a summer with a potential labor dispute will be next to impossible. The Flames are screwed for awhile if they trade them and if they don't trade them; what fans want to know is which is the quicker path back to playoff contention.
If the 'Yotes do have to learn French, the team will be an automatic contender in the capital of La Belle Province. Though Shane Doan might not make the trip to Quebec. If, a big if, that happens, we will assess that move when the team is safely across the border and not a moment before.
State of Canadian teams
The state of the Canadian teams is not strong. Vancouver might not think it's very strong, but the team is the strongest among the Canadian entries. Ottawa is the second strongest by default, but would have to overcome the potential loss of Daniel Alfredsson and filling a hole or two and hoping Erik Karlsson isn't a one-hit wonder. Toronto, Winnipeg, and Calgary are perennial 10th place teams playing like they are in the NHL of the mid-1990s where you can sort of coast to the playoffs.
A return of the Nordiques to Quebec should give Montréal a kick in the pants to step it up. And Edmonton also needs to find out what kind of team it wants to be. The Senators should inspire the Oilers that you can win with youth if you do it right.
The Montréal Canadiens will celebrate 20 years without the Stanley Cup, and that team has the shortest streak without the Cup among Canadian franchises. This year, no Canadian team made it to the second round. If this doesn't inspire some improvement among the Canadian-based teams, we don't know what will work. Having Phoenix or Nashville raise the Stanley Cup?